Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether a memorandum of appeal filed beyond time could be treated as cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. (ii) Whether leave to file cross-objections in forma pauperis could be granted under Order 44 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Issue (i): Whether a memorandum of appeal filed beyond time could be treated as cross-objections under Order 41 Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Analysis: The Court held that the scheme of Order 41 Rule 22 did not exclude the conversion of a time-barred appeal into cross-objections where the respondent's right to object had accrued and the appeal could be entertained in that form. It relied on earlier authority recognising that cross-objections are not confined to a rigid procedural form so long as the substance of the right can be preserved.
Conclusion: Yes. The time-barred memorandum of appeal could be treated as cross-objections.
Issue (ii): Whether leave to file cross-objections in forma pauperis could be granted under Order 44 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
Analysis: Once the memorandum was treated as cross-objections, the Court examined the judgment and decree and found no legal impediment to proceeding under Order 44 Rule 1. As the cross-objector had been found to be a pauper, the procedural benefit of filing in forma pauperis was available.
Conclusion: Yes. Leave to file the cross-objections in forma pauperis was granted.
Final Conclusion: The applications succeeded, and the memorandum of appeal was permitted to operate as cross-objections with pauper status.
Ratio Decidendi: A time-barred appeal may, in a fit case, be treated as cross-objections, and where the applicant is a pauper, leave to present such cross-objections in forma pauperis may be granted.