Concluded appellate entitlement to interest on excess advance tax cannot be reopened in later proceedings.

An issue conclusively decided in an earlier appellate order, and not challenged by the Department, cannot be reopened in later proceedings through a subsequent clarificatory or consequential order. Applying that principle, the assessee's entitlement to interest on excess advance tax had already been determined under section 214, so the later refusal by the Income-tax Officer could not override the concluded relief. The Tribunal was therefore correct in declining to entertain the Revenue's attempt to reagitate entitlement, and no question of law arose from its view.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the Revenue could reopen the allowance of interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 after accepting the earlier appellate order granting that relief; (ii) whether the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the excess advance tax paid.

Issue (i): Whether the Revenue could reopen the allowance of interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 after accepting the earlier appellate order granting that relief.

Analysis: The earlier order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) had already held that the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214, and the Income-tax Officer was only required to verify the figures and compute the amount payable. Since that order was not appealed by the Department, the question of entitlement could not be reagitated in a later round.

Conclusion: The Revenue was barred from reopening the issue, and the Tribunal was right in refusing to entertain that contention.

Issue (ii): Whether the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 on the excess advance tax paid.

Analysis: The assessment resulted in tax payable being less than the advance tax already paid, and the appellate authority had already determined that the assessee was entitled to interest under section 214. The later order of the Income-tax Officer denying such interest could not override that concluded entitlement.

Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to interest under section 214.

Final Conclusion: No question of law arose from the Tribunal's view, and the reference application was rightly rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: An issue conclusively decided in an earlier appellate order, and not challenged by the aggrieved party, cannot be reopened in subsequent proceedings merely through a later clarificatory or consequential order.

---