Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to relief under section 25(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 in respect of the contract business on the ground that the business had been succeeded to by the partnership in 1942.
Analysis: Relief under section 25(4) depends on there being a succession to a business and continuity of the business up to the point of succession. The contract activity was a recognised business. On the materials, the family's contract business had been carried on continuously from 1920, first in partnership with Arunachalam and thereafter by the family, and the 1942 family arrangement showed that the partnership took over the entire contract business previously conducted by the family. The earlier death of Arunachalam did not break the continuity of the business, and the assessee had also been assessed on the contract income under the earlier enactment.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to relief under section 25(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and the assessee obtained costs.
Ratio Decidendi: A business is not disqualified from section 25(4) relief because it is carried on through contracts, and continuity of the business is sufficient where the successor takes over the whole business notwithstanding an earlier change in the persons carrying it on.