Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 could be directed on the basis of facts not found by the Tribunal, and whether any question of law arose from the Tribunal's order granting deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I.
Analysis: The application sought reference of questions concerning the assessee's entitlement to deduction under sections 80HH and 80-I and its treatment as an industrial company. The Court noted that the Revenue's challenge rested on factual circumstances which had not been brought to the notice of, or found by, the Tribunal. A reference under section 256 could be made only on the basis of facts admitted or found by the Tribunal, and the High Court could not be asked to decide a reference founded on facts outside the Tribunal's record.
Conclusion: No referable question of law arose from the Tribunal's order, and the application under section 256(2) was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: A reference under section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 lies only on questions arising from facts admitted or found by the Tribunal, and cannot be directed on the basis of facts not so found.