TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Rule 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Selection for Post-Graduation Course Rules, 1984 entitled a candidate to admission against a seat that fell vacant in the midst of or towards the end of the concerned academic year. (ii) Whether the State Government had power to transfer a postgraduate medical seat reserved for one medical college to another medical college in the State.
Issue (i): Whether Rule 10 of the Madhya Pradesh Selection for Post-Graduation Course Rules, 1984 entitled a candidate to admission against a seat that fell vacant in the midst of or towards the end of the concerned academic year.
Analysis: Rule 10 was read on its plain terms. The expression that seats available in any particular year would be filled up in that year, followed by the prohibition that no candidate would be admitted against seats remaining vacant from the previous year, was treated as a complete bar to carrying forward vacancies. The scheme was held to require that a vacancy be filled within the academic year to which it pertained. The postgraduate medical course was also noted to be a demanding course with limited seats and a strict student-teacher ratio, which reinforced the conclusion that belated admission would defeat the structure of training and standards.
Conclusion: A candidate had no right to admission against a seat that became vacant in the midst of or towards the end of the academic year, and such vacancy could not be carried forward to a later year.
Issue (ii): Whether the State Government had power to transfer a postgraduate medical seat reserved for one medical college to another medical college in the State.
Analysis: No provision was shown conferring authority on the State Government to shift a seat reserved for one medical college to another medical college in order to accommodate a particular student. The seat remained part of the sanctioned intake of the original college, and the contrary view of the High Court could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The State Government had no power to transfer such a seat from one medical college to another.
Final Conclusion: The challenge failed because Rule 10 did not permit admission against a vacancy carried into a later academic year, and no authority existed to relocate a reserved postgraduate seat between colleges.
Ratio Decidendi: Vacancies in postgraduate medical seats must be filled within the academic year to which they relate, and no carry-forward or inter-college transfer is permissible unless the governing rules expressly so provide.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
