Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 108/95-C.E. for the three motor vehicles cleared without payment of duty, and if so, whether the claim required verification of supporting evidence showing supply for the UNICEF project.
Analysis: The exemption notification granted conditional duty relief for goods supplied to the UN and other international organizations for their projects. The certificates produced by the appellant covered the goods cleared, but they were issued in favour of M/s. Eicher Motors Ltd. and referred to the UNICEF purchase order placed on that concern. On that basis, further documentary proof was necessary to establish that the goods had in fact been supplied for the UNICEF project either by the appellant or through M/s. Eicher Motors Ltd. The appellant was permitted to produce such evidence.
Conclusion: The claim to exemption was accepted in principle, but its allowance was made subject to furnishing documentary proof before the Original Authority.