Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the notification declaring the undertaking a relief undertaking under the Bombay Relief Undertakings (Special Provisions) Act, 1957 barred enforcement of orders passed by a court outside Gujarat against the undertaking's properties situated in Gujarat.
Analysis: Section 4(1)(a)(iv) of the Act suspends the enforcement of pre-existing rights, liabilities and remedies during the currency of the notification. The provision cannot be read as giving the State Legislature extra-territorial effect, but it can validly operate within the State so as to interdict execution against the relief undertaking's properties situated in Gujarat. The pendency of proceedings outside the State is not suspended, yet enforcement of the resulting order within Gujarat stands stayed for so long as the notification remains in force.
Conclusion: The notification protected the undertaking's properties in Gujarat from execution of the foreign court order, and the receiver was not entitled to take possession of those assets.