1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Appeal Remanded for Evidence Review: Relief Must Comply with Circular Guidelines</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI remanded the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) to examine relevant evidence as per Circular No. 97/8/2007 before ... Natural Justice - non-examination of full records - Boardβs Circular No.97/8/2007 dated 23.8.2007 - Held that: - Learned Commissioner (Appeals) did not examine relevant evidence in the light of the Boardβs Circular No.97/8/2007 dated 23.8.2007. Mere citing of the circular or law does not ipso facto grant relief. Therefore, appellate Commissioner should be careful in future not to grant relief mechanically but only upon satisfaction of the conditions of the circular - appeal is remanded to learned Commissioner (Appeals) to examine relevant evidence called for by the circular and pass appropriate order - appeal allowed by way of remand. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI remanded the appeal to the Commissioner (Appeals) to examine relevant evidence called for by Circular No. 97/8/2007 before granting relief. The Commissioner should not grant relief mechanically but only upon satisfaction of the conditions of the circular.