Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether physician samples cleared on payment of duty were liable to be valued under Section 4(1)(a) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 on the basis of the actual sale price, and whether pro rata valuation on the price of commercial packs could be applied.
Analysis: The assessable value of physician samples depends on whether a normal price is available under Section 4(1)(a). Where the samples are admittedly sold to wholesale distributors and the sale price is the sole consideration, that price constitutes the proper assessable value. A pro rata comparison with commercial packs is not warranted when the samples are not cleared free of cost and the factual matrix shows actual sales at the factory gate. The earlier decision in the same respondents' case had already applied this principle and distinguished the Larger Bench ruling dealing with free samples.
Conclusion: The physician samples were correctly valued on the basis of their actual sale price under Section 4(1)(a), and the Revenue's challenge to the valuation failed.
Final Conclusion: The appeal was rejected because the disputed valuation issue had already been decided in favour of the assessee's method of assessment.
Ratio Decidendi: Where physician samples are sold and a normal price exists, their assessable value must be taken under Section 4(1)(a) on the actual sale price, and pro rata valuation based on commercial packs is inapplicable.