Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether hemodialysis or renal dialysis equipment could be classified under Entry 8421 of the Indian Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the basis of the common parlance approach and the CBEC circular could be sustained.
Analysis: Entry 8421 deals with filtering and purifying machinery for liquids and includes dialysers and special type filters through which liquids pass by diffusion, but it also excludes artificial kidney apparatus. The classification could not be expanded by treating blood as a liquid in general or by applying the common parlance principle so as to bring hemodialysis within the entry. Hemodialysis and renal dialysis are distinct processes and are not merely a matter of separation of liquids from colloidal particles. The circular proceeding on that basis was therefore inconsistent with the tariff entry.
Conclusion: The challenge to the circular failed, and the classification adopted by the single Judge was upheld, resulting in a decision in favour of the respondent and against the Department.