Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal's direction to deposit 1% of the penalty as a condition for hearing the appeal deserved modification.
Analysis: The petitioner was an employee of a CHA and, in earlier proceedings arising from the same chain of transactions, a substantially lower pre-deposit had been directed having regard to that status. The present challenge concerned a much higher penalty, and the Court maintained consistency with the earlier approach by reassessing the pre-deposit requirement in light of the petitioner's position and the circumstances of the case.
Conclusion: The pre-deposit condition was reduced to Rs. 5 lakhs and the balance demand was stayed, with the appeal to be heard on merits.
Final Conclusion: The impugned pre-deposit order was modified and the petition was disposed of with consequential relief.