Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the low tax effect and the binding nature of Instruction No. 3/2011 on pending proceedings.
Analysis: The tax effect involved in the appeal was below the prescribed monetary limit of Rs. 10,00,000/-. Instruction No. 3/2011 barred filing of appeals to the High Court where the tax effect was below that threshold, and the Court had already held that the instruction applied to pending proceedings as well. On that basis, the appeal could not be entertained.
Conclusion: The appeal was held to be not maintainable and was dismissed, which is against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee.