Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the Central Government could withhold statutory stowing assistance and appropriate it towards arrears of royalty payable by the coal company on the basis of set-off or equitable adjustment.
Issue (i): Whether the Central Government could withhold statutory stowing assistance and appropriate it towards arrears of royalty payable by the coal company on the basis of set-off or equitable adjustment.
Analysis: The stowing assistance was payable under the Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974 and was intended to secure conservation and safety in coal mines. The claimed royalty arrears arose from a separate contractual obligation under the mining lease. No contractual agreement or statutory provision authorised the Central Government to retain the assistance and adjust it against the royalty claim. The principles of legal set-off and equitable set-off did not apply because the claims did not arise from the same transaction, and the assistance was meant for a public and beneficial statutory purpose.
Conclusion: The Central Government could not withhold or adjust the statutory stowing assistance against royalty arrears.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition succeeded and the appeal was dismissed, while the Government was left free to recover any royalty dues by other lawful means.
Ratio Decidendi: Statutory assistance payable for a public purpose cannot be withheld by way of set-off against an unrelated contractual demand unless the statute or the contract expressly authorises such adjustment, and equitable set-off is unavailable where the cross-demands do not arise from the same transaction.