1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Upholds 3% Profit Estimation for Tainted Purchases</h1> The Tribunal upheld the estimation of profit at 3% for tainted purchases, deeming it fair and reasonable based on the specific circumstances. Both the ... - Issues involved: Estimation of profits after rejection of books of account.I.T.A.No.5927/M/09 (Revenue's appeal): The Revenue challenged the estimation of Gross Profit (GP) at 3% on tainted purchases, arguing that it should be 4.5% on the entire turnover. The Tribunal noted a similar issue in a previous case and upheld the estimation of profit at 3% for tainted purchases, deeming it fair and reasonable based on the specific circumstances. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal.C.O.116/M/10 (Assessee's cross objection): The Assessee objected to the rejection of book profit and the estimation of GP at 3%. They argued that the rejection was unfounded as transactions were through proper banking channels and had quantitative tally. The Tribunal upheld the estimation of profit at 3% for tainted purchases, considering the low profit margin in the Assessee's line of business. Following the precedent set in a previous case, the Tribunal confirmed the action of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and dismissed the Assessee's cross objection.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the estimation of profit at 3% for tainted purchases, considering it fair and reasonable based on the specific circumstances of the case. Both the Revenue's appeal and the Assessee's cross objection were dismissed in light of the Tribunal's findings and the precedent set in a previous case.