Service tax on commercial training or coaching and the training-versus-education distinction were raised, with no final merits ruling.

Service tax liability was examined in the context of whether activities fell within commercial training or coaching service under section 65(26) read with section 65(27) of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether a legally relevant distinction exists between training or coaching and education. The appeal was admitted on substantial questions of law, but there was no final adjudication on the merits of tax liability.

---

---

Issues: Whether service tax was payable under the category of commercial training or coaching service under section 65(26) read with section 65(27) of the Finance Act, 1994, and whether there is any distinction between training and coaching on one hand and education on the other.

Outcome: The appeal was admitted on the substantial questions of law framed; no final adjudication was made on the merits of the tax liability.

---