Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a listed investment company's decision to dispose of part of its investment for raising funds for a new acquisition constituted price sensitive information requiring disclosure under the insider trading regulations.
Analysis: Price sensitive information is information which, if published, is likely to materially affect the price of securities, and the statutory explanation treats certain events as price sensitive, including disposal of the whole or substantial part of an undertaking. A decision by an investment company to switch or dispose of part of its investments in the ordinary course of its business does not, by itself, materially affect the price of its securities. The expression "undertaking" in the explanation cannot be stretched to cover investments held by an investment company as its stock-in-trade. The non-disclosure concerned only the source of funding and not a transaction that was inherently price sensitive.
Conclusion: The decision to dispose of part of the investment was not price sensitive information and no violation of the insider trading regulations was made out against the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi: For an investment company, a decision to sell part of its investment portfolio to finance a business acquisition is not price sensitive information unless it is shown to be likely to materially affect the price of its securities.