TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Division Bench allows appeal, permits substitution in Company Petition</h1> <h3>In Re. : Mafatlal Denim Limited.</h3> The Division Bench allowed Sicom Limited's appeal against the Company Petition, deeming it not maintainable under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act. The ... - Issues involved: Application for substitution of Mishapar Investments Limited in place of Sicom Limited in Company Petition No.34 of 2009 pending before the Court.Summary:1. The applicant Company filed an application seeking permission to convene meetings of secured creditors for a compromise scheme. Subsequently, Company Petition No.34 of 2009 was filed under Section 391(1) of the Companies Act for sanctioning the compromise scheme approved by secured creditors. 2. Company Application No.1 of 2009 was filed to restrain Sicom Limited, a secured creditor, from legal proceedings under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporation Act. The court stayed Sicom Limited's actions. However, the application was later dismissed, leading to an appeal by the applicant Company.3. The Division Bench allowed Sicom Limited's appeal against the Company Petition, stating it was not maintainable under Section 391(1) of the Act. The applicant Company then appealed to the Apex Court through Special Leave Petitions.4. During the pendency of the Special Leave Petitions, Sicom Limited assigned its debts, rights, and interests to Mishapar Investments Limited. The Apex Court, upon settlement between the parties, allowed the substitution of Mishapar Investments Limited in place of Sicom Limited. The matter was remanded to the Company Judge for consideration under Section 391 of the Companies Act.5. The parties had no objections to the substitution, and the Court allowed the application based on the Apex Court's order. Mishapar Investments Limited was permitted to replace Sicom Limited in Company Petition No.34 of 2009.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
