TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the agreement dated June 1985 attracted Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and justified the pre-emption order; (ii) whether the transaction instead fell within Chapter XX-A and could be proceeded with on the basis of Form No. 37EE already filed.
Issue (i): Whether the agreement dated June 1985 attracted Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and justified the pre-emption order.
Analysis: Chapter XX-C was held to operate only from its notified commencement, and a mere agreement for sale was treated as insufficient to constitute the kind of right contemplated by the Chapter. The agreement in question was construed, however, not as a bare agreement for sale but as an acquisition of the full rights of the existing holder in respect of flats to be constructed. On that footing, the transaction was not governed by the preliminary agreement framework of Chapter XX-C, and Form No. 37-I could not validly sustain action under that Chapter.
Conclusion: Chapter XX-C did not apply, and the pre-emption order passed under that Chapter was unsustainable.
Issue (ii): Whether the transaction instead fell within Chapter XX-A and could be proceeded with on the basis of Form No. 37EE already filed.
Analysis: The Court held that the agreement constituted a complete transfer of the relevant rights in relation to the future flats, bringing it within the wider language of Chapter XX-A, particularly the provision covering rights with respect to property still to be constructed. The filing of Form No. 37EE was therefore treated as appropriate, and the respondents were left free to act upon that filing in accordance with law.
Conclusion: The transaction was amenable to Chapter XX-A, and proceedings could continue on the basis of Form No. 37EE.
Final Conclusion: The impugned pre-emption order was quashed, Chapter XX-C was held inapplicable to the transaction, and the authorities were left at liberty to proceed under Chapter XX-A on the earlier filing.
Ratio Decidendi: A transaction concerning rights in flats to be constructed, where the agreement conveys the existing holder's full rights and is not a mere agreement for sale, may fall within Chapter XX-A but not Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
