Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (7) TMI 1247 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision, dismissing Revenue's appeal on commission payment. Deduction u/s 80IB allowed for interest income. The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The disallowance of Rs. 46,46,867/- on commission payment to M/s Sadem India Ltd. ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision, dismissing Revenue's appeal on commission payment. Deduction u/s 80IB allowed for interest income.

                          The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. The disallowance of Rs. 46,46,867/- on commission payment to M/s Sadem India Ltd. was deleted, as the services provided were found genuine and necessary for business operations. Additionally, the deduction u/s 80IB on interest income from Bank FDRs amounting to Rs. 2,75,187/- was allowed, as it was deemed directly connected to the industrial undertaking. The order was pronounced on 18/07/2014.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deletion of disallowance of Rs. 46,46,867/- made on account of payment of commission to M/s Sadem India Ltd.
                          2. Allowance of deduction u/s 80IB on interest on Bank FDRs amounting to Rs. 2,75,187/-.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deletion of Disallowance of Rs. 46,46,867/- on Commission Payment:

                          The Revenue appealed against the CIT(A)'s order, which deleted the disallowance of Rs. 46,46,867/- made by the Assessing Officer (A.O.) concerning the commission paid to M/s Sadem India Ltd. The A.O. questioned the legitimacy of the commission payment, arguing that M/s Sadem India Ltd. did not provide any tangible services to justify the commission. The A.O. based this on the assessment of M/s Sadem India Ltd., which indicated no significant expenses or services provided.

                          The CIT(A) observed that M/s Sadem India Ltd. had political and public relations, which were beneficial for procuring tenders. The commission payments were made through account payee cheques, and TDS was deducted and deposited with the government. The CIT(A) relied on the ITAT's decision in DCIT Vs. Vhanketeshwar Wires Pvt. Ltd., where similar commission payments were allowed.

                          The ITAT, upon revisiting the case as directed by the High Court, noted that the assessee provided sufficient evidence of services rendered by M/s Sadem India Ltd., including tender information, liaisoning with electricity boards, and assisting in recovering payments. The ITAT found no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order and confirmed the deletion of the disallowance, citing the genuineness of the commission payments and the services rendered.

                          2. Allowance of Deduction u/s 80IB on Interest on Bank FDRs:

                          The A.O. disallowed the deduction u/s 80IB on interest income from Bank FDRs amounting to Rs. 2,75,187/-, arguing that this income was not derived from industrial activity. The CIT(A) reversed this disallowance, stating that the FDRs were made for bank guarantees required by the Electricity Board, which were essential for the assessee's business operations. Therefore, the interest income was directly connected to the industrial undertaking.

                          The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, agreeing that the FDRs were made for business purposes and the interest income was intrinsically linked to the industrial undertaking. The ITAT also considered the netting of interest income, which further supported the assessee's claim for deduction u/s 80IB.

                          Conclusion:

                          The ITAT dismissed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the CIT(A)'s decisions on both issues. The commission payment to M/s Sadem India Ltd. was deemed genuine and necessary for business operations, and the interest on Bank FDRs was considered directly connected to the industrial undertaking, qualifying for deduction u/s 80IB. The order was pronounced in the open court on 18/07/2014.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found