Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee could take suo motu re-credit of Cenvat credit earlier reversed by mistake in respect of furnace oil used for job-worked goods, and whether Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 barred such re-credit.
Analysis: The credit reversed was found to have been taken again only as a book entry after the assessee ascertained that the earlier reversal was mistaken and that the final excisable goods manufactured out of the job-worked goods had suffered duty at the principal manufacturer's end. On those facts, the credit reversal and re-credit did not involve any unjust enrichment and there was no requirement to file a refund claim under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The embargo in Rule 6(1) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 was held inapplicable because the job-worked goods were ultimately used in the manufacture of duty-paid final products by the principal manufacturer.
Conclusion: Suo motu re-credit was permissible, and the denial of re-credit under Rule 6(1) was unsustainable.
Final Conclusion: The disallowance of Cenvat re-credit and the related demand did not survive.
Ratio Decidendi: Where Cenvat credit is reversed by mistake and later re-credited only as a book adjustment, and the job-worked goods are used in the manufacture of duty-paid final products, suo motu re-credit is permissible and Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 does not bar such credit.