Reassessment notice under VAT law upheld where prima facie under-assessment was alleged and classification merits were left open.

Section 21(1)(a) of the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 permits reassessment where a dealer has been under-assessed or has escaped assessment. The Court held that a show cause notice proposing to treat the petitioner's product differently for tax purposes and to reassess on the basis of an allegedly insufficient earlier assessment was within jurisdiction. It declined to decide the merits of the classification dispute or whether the earlier view was correct at the notice stage, found a prima facie basis for reassessment, and allowed the petitioner to file a detailed reply before the authority, which was directed to decide the matter in accordance with law. The challenge to quash the notice was rejected.

---

---

Issues: Whether the show cause notice and initiation of reassessment proceedings under Section 21 of the Madhya Pradesh VAT Act, 2002 were liable to be quashed on the ground of change of opinion and alleged prior assessment at a lower rate.

Analysis: Section 21(1)(a) permits reassessment where a dealer has been under-assessed or has escaped assessment. The notice indicated that the authority proposed to treat the petitioner's product differently for tax purposes and to reassess on the basis that the earlier assessment was insufficient. At the stage of a show cause notice, the Court declined to decide the merits of the classification dispute or the question whether the earlier view was correct. The petitioner was given liberty to submit a detailed reply before the authority, which was to decide the matter in accordance with law. The Court found that the notice was within jurisdiction and that a prima facie case for reassessment existed.

Conclusion: The challenge to the show cause notice and reassessment proceedings was rejected, and the notices were not quashed.

---