Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for the purpose of service tax on telephone rental under the Own Your Telephone Scheme, the subscriber's taxable value was the gross bi-monthly rental of Rs. 380 or the reduced rental of Rs. 340 after giving effect to the initial lump sum payment.
Analysis: Under the Own Your Telephone Scheme, the subscriber makes an initial lump sum payment towards rental and, in consideration of that payment, receives a reduction in rental for a fixed period. Rule 2(cc) of the Indian Telegraph Rules, 1951 treats the arrangement as a scheme of advance rental payment with a corresponding reduction in annual rental, not as a deposit. Section 67(b) of the Finance Act, 1994 values telephone services by the gross total amount received from the subscriber, including adjustments made from deposits; that bracketed part applies only where the amount is in the nature of a deposit. Since the initial payment under the scheme was held to be rental payment and not a deposit, the reduction had to be given effect to while determining the taxable value. On that basis, the amount relevant for service tax was Rs. 340 and not Rs. 380.
Conclusion: The reduced rental of Rs. 340 was the correct taxable value, and the service tax demand based on Rs. 380 was unsustainable.