Delhi High Court approves Companies Act merger/demerger scheme, grants dispensation from shareholder meetings The Delhi High Court allowed the joint application under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the approval of a Composite Scheme of ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delhi High Court approves Companies Act merger/demerger scheme, grants dispensation from shareholder meetings
The Delhi High Court allowed the joint application under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for the approval of a Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving the merger and demerger of companies. The scheme included merging the transferor company with the transferee company, demerging the industrial division and investment business, and retaining the high-end business center with the transferee company. The court granted dispensation from convening meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors, as consent was obtained. The judgment was issued in Dasti, finalizing the approval of the scheme as per the application.
Issues: Application under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 for approval of Composite Scheme of Arrangement involving merger and demerger of companies.
Analysis: 1. The application filed by Ecotrust Capital Private Limited, Chemical and Metallurgical Design Company Limited, Unisystems Packers, and Talentgenie Consultants Private Limited sought approval for a Composite Scheme of Arrangement under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The scheme involved the merger of the transferor company with the transferee company, followed by the demerger of the industrial division and investment business into resulting companies. The purpose was to merge the industrial division with resulting company no. 1 and the investment business with resulting company no. 2, while the high-end business center would remain with the transferee company.
2. The registered office of the companies was in Delhi, falling within the territorial jurisdiction of the Delhi High Court where the application was made.
3. Details regarding the authorized, issued, subscribed, and paid-up capital of the companies were provided in the scheme, along with copies of the Memorandum and Articles of Association and the latest audited annual accounts.
4. The applicants confirmed that no proceedings were pending against them under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act.
5. The Board of Directors of the companies had approved the scheme, and copies of the Board resolutions were submitted with the application.
6. Consent from equity shareholders and unsecured creditors was obtained for the scheme. The table presented the number of shareholders and creditors for each company along with the consent status. The application requested dispensation from convening meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors, which was granted after examining the letters of consent.
7. As there were no secured creditors, meetings for that class were unnecessary. The prayer to dispense with the requirement of convening meetings for shareholders and unsecured creditors of the transferee/demerged company was allowed.
8. The joint application for the scheme was allowed by the Delhi High Court in the terms presented in the application.
9. The judgment was issued in Dasti, indicating that the parties involved were provided with the necessary copies of the judgment.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
AI OCR ✕
of 
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
