Service tax code delay cannot by itself defeat refund claims when allotment was timely applied for and other conditions were met.

Refund under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. could not be rejected solely because the service tax code number was not available when the claim was filed, where the applicant had already applied for allotment of the code and the delay in issuance was attributable to the Department. The stated basis for rejection was confined to this procedural deficiency, while the other notification conditions were not in dispute. On these facts, the absence of the code number was treated as an insufficient ground to deny the claim, and the refund was required to be processed and paid if the remaining requirements of the notification were met.

---

---

Issues: Whether refund or rebate under Notification No. 41/2007-S.T. could be rejected merely because the applicant did not possess the service tax code number at the time of filing the refund claim, when the application for allotment of the code had already been made and the other conditions of the notification were not in dispute.

Analysis: The only ground for rejection was non-availability of the service tax code number in the refund application. The record showed that the appellant had applied for allotment of the code along with the refund claim and that the code was not allotted within the prescribed period because of delay on the part of the Department. Since the appellant had taken the requisite step in time and the delay was attributable to the Department, the absence of the code number could not be used against the claimant. The refund was otherwise stated to satisfy the conditions of the notification.

Conclusion: Rejection of the refund claim on this ground was not justified, and the claim was required to be processed and paid if the remaining conditions of the notification were fulfilled.

---