Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudicating authority, while deciding the show cause notice under the Central Excise Act, 1944, is bound to follow Section 9D(1) before relying on statements recorded during investigation and to afford the assessee an opportunity of cross-examination.
Analysis: Section 9D(1) makes statements recorded before a gazetted Central Excise Officer relevant only in the circumstances specified in clauses (a) and (b). If clause (a) does not apply, the statement cannot be treated as relevant for proving the truth of its contents unless the maker is first examined as a witness before the adjudicating authority and the authority records a reasoned opinion that the statement should be admitted in evidence in the interests of justice. The procedure is mandatory and applies to adjudication proceedings as well. Statements recorded behind the back of the assessee cannot be relied upon unless this statutory procedure is followed, and cross-examination becomes available only after such examination-in-chief.
Conclusion: The adjudicating authority must follow Section 9D(1) and the principles of natural justice before relying on such statements, and the assessee is entitled to seek cross-examination in accordance with law.