TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Trustees not liable under Income-tax Act; court quashes alleged offenses, clarifies tax liability.</h1> <h3>ML Family Trust And Others Versus State Of Gujarat And Another</h3> The court held that section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not applicable to the petitioners' case involving trustees' liability to deduct and pay ... Failure To Deduct Tax At Source, Representative Assessee Issues Involved: The judgment involves the interpretation of sections 194A, 2(31), and 161(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding the liability of trustees to deduct and pay tax on interest amounts credited to payees' accounts.Interpretation of Section 194A: The complaints were filed against the petitioners for alleged breaches under section 276B read with section 278B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The complaints were related to failure to deduct tax from interest amounts credited to payees' accounts and failure to pay the tax after deduction. The petitioners contended that section 194A of the Act, which pertains to deduction of income tax on interest payments, was not applicable to their case.Liability of Trustees: The complainants argued that as the petitioners included a trust and trustees, they were responsible for deducting and paying the tax on interest amounts credited to payees. They cited sections 2(31) and 161(1) of the Act to support their claim that both the trust and trustees should be held liable for the tax obligations. However, the petitioners' counsel argued that trustees should be assessed in the same manner as beneficiaries, relying on a Supreme Court decision in a similar context.Legal Position and Decision: The court analyzed the legal provisions and the arguments presented. It concluded that section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was not applicable to the petitioners' case. Therefore, there was no basis for the alleged offences under section 276B read with section 278B of the Act. The court held that the process issued against the accused should be quashed, and subsequently, the applications were dismissed. The ruling clarified that trustees were not liable under section 194A in this scenario, leading to the dismissal of the complaints against the petitioners.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
