TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether loans advanced by a non-resident money-lender outside British India to persons in British India could be treated as income accruing or arising through or from a business connection in British India under Section 42(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The charging provision applied only where profits or gains of a person residing out of British India accrued or arose, directly or indirectly, through or from a business connection in British India. A mere lending transaction did not by itself establish such a connection. The facts showed no evidence that the impugned loans were made through the assessee's partnership business or through any other business connection in British India. The loans were treated as isolated transactions, and there was no course of dealing or subsisting business relationship with the particular borrowers that could satisfy the statutory expression. The provisions dealing with non-resident agency and connected income had to be read consistently with this requirement.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the negative. The impugned loan profits were not assessable under Section 42(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 on the footing of a business connection in British India, and the decision was in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: For Section 42(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1922 to apply, there must be a real business connection in British India giving rise to the profits, and a mere isolated lending transaction with a person in British India does not constitute such a connection.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
