1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Supreme Court granted leave after condoning the delay in the case.</h1> Supreme Court granted leave after condoning the delay in the case. - TMI Validity of assessment in the name of a company which had been amalgamated - HC [2011 (8) TMI 544 - DELHI HIGH COURT] held that Section 292B are not applicable in such a case. The framing of assessment against a non-existing entity/person goes to the root of the matter which is not a procedural irregularity but a jurisdictional defect as there cannot be any assessment against a 'dead person - Held that:- Delay condoned. Leave granted. Supreme Court judgment: 2014 (1) TMI 1807 - SC Order. Justices Ranjana Prakash Desai and Madan B. Lokur presiding. Petitioner represented by Mr. K. Radhakrishnan, Respondent represented by Mr. Ajay Vohra. Delay condoned, leave granted.