TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the instrument executed on the retirement of three partners was a conveyance on sale chargeable under Article 25(b) of Schedule I to the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. (ii) Whether the instrument was a deed of dissolution chargeable under Article 47(b) of Schedule I to the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. (iii) If neither of those articles applied, under which provision the instrument was chargeable.
Issue (i): Whether the instrument executed on the retirement of three partners was a conveyance on sale chargeable under Article 25(b) of Schedule I to the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
Analysis: A conveyance under Section 2(g) of the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 includes a transfer of property inter vivos. The instrument merely recorded the retirement of three partners, the taking of accounts, the ascertainment of their shares in the net partnership assets, and the payment or credit of those shares. A partner has no specific proprietary interest in partnership assets during the subsistence of the firm and, on retirement, receives only the value of his share after liabilities and prior charges are met. The transaction was therefore an adjustment of partnership rights and not a transfer of interest for a price.
Conclusion: The instrument was not a conveyance on sale and was not chargeable under Article 25(b).
Issue (ii): Whether the instrument was a deed of dissolution chargeable under Article 47(b) of Schedule I to the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
Analysis: The instrument did not dissolve the firm or record any dissolution. Only three partners retired and the firm continued with the remaining partners. A deed of dissolution presupposes extinction of the firm, which was absent here.
Conclusion: The instrument was not chargeable under Article 47(b).
Issue (iii): If neither of those articles applied, under which provision the instrument was chargeable.
Analysis: The instrument was in substance an agreement or memorandum of agreement relating to retirement from the firm. Such an instrument fell within Article 5 of the First Schedule to the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
Conclusion: The instrument was chargeable under Article 5 of the First Schedule.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the document was neither a conveyance on sale nor a deed of dissolution, and that it was chargeable as an agreement relating to retirement of partners.
Ratio Decidendi: Retiring partners do not transfer a proprietary interest in specific partnership assets to the continuing partners; on retirement, they merely receive the value of their share in the net partnership assets after settlement of accounts, so the instrument is an adjustment of partnership rights and not a conveyance on sale.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
