Appellant's refund claims granted under Notification No.41/2007-ST, except for goods transport agency services.

The appellant's refund claims for terminal handling charges, Bill of lading charges, and CHA services were granted as they were found eligible under Notification No.41/2007-ST for services used in exporting goods. However, the refund claim for goods transport agency services was remanded for further verification of payment evidence provided by the appellant. The appeals were disposed of with a favorable decision for the appellant on most refund claims, except for the goods transport agency services which required additional scrutiny by the adjudicating authority.

---

---

Issues:
1. Refund claim for terminal handling charges and Bill of lading charges under port services.
2. Refund claim for CHA services.
3. Refund claim for goods transport agency services.

Analysis:
1. The appellant filed a refund claim under Notification No.41/2007-ST for services used in exporting goods. The claim for terminal handling and Bill of lading charges was initially denied, stating these services were not under port services. However, referencing a judgment by the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, it was established that these services fall under port services. Consequently, the appellant is entitled to a refund for these charges under the said notification.

2. The refund claim for CHA services was also rejected due to lack of specifics about the services availed. However, it was noted that the CHA had issued invoices and certificates related to the services provided to the appellant. Based on this evidence, it was concluded that the appellant is eligible for a refund for the services received from the CHA for exporting goods.

3. Regarding the refund claim for goods transport agency services, it was disputed that the appellant did not provide a lorry receipt or evidence of service tax payment by either themselves or the service provider. As a result, the refund was initially denied. The appellant argued that they were both consignee and consignor, and had paid the service tax, providing evidence to the adjudicating authority. The matter was therefore remanded to the adjudicating authority to verify the payment of transportation charges and service tax by the appellant, considering the evidence presented.

In conclusion, the appeals were disposed of with the decision favoring the appellant on the refund claims for terminal handling charges, Bill of lading charges, and CHA services, while further investigation was required for the refund claim related to goods transport agency services.

---