TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal dismisses Revenue's appeal, emphasizes evidence and compliance in tax assessments.</h1> <h3>Income Tax Officer, Ward-8 (1), Hyderabad Versus Sri Nilaya Projects, Hyderabad</h3> Income Tax Officer, Ward-8 (1), Hyderabad Versus Sri Nilaya Projects, Hyderabad - TMI Issues:1. Addition of undisclosed income during survey proceedings.2. Disallowance under sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia).3. Appeal against the CIT(A) order.Issue 1 - Addition of Undisclosed Income:The assessee, a builder, admitted additional income of Rs. 15 lakhs during a survey but did not disclose it in the return of income for A.Y. 2008-09. The AO proposed additions based on discrepancies observed during the survey. The CIT(A) confirmed the additions under sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) due to clear violations. However, the CIT(A) recognized the disclosure of Rs. 15 lakhs during the survey and adjusted it against the total additions, concluding that only the net addition of Rs. 16,07,372 should stand. The Department appealed, arguing for sustaining the full Rs. 15 lakhs addition. The Tribunal held that the addition solely based on the assessee's confession during the survey lacked supporting evidence and deleted the Rs. 15 lakhs addition, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision.Issue 2 - Disallowance under Sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia):The AO disallowed expenses under sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia) concerning labor and material payments. The AR argued that labor payments were based on attendance and did not breach section 40A(3) limits. Additionally, material payments were made on-site to various vendors, justifying the expenses. The AR contended that section 40(a)(ia) did not apply to individual payments. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowances, citing violations and lack of evidence to counter discrepancies. The Tribunal remitted the disallowances back to the AO for a fair assessment based on the evidence and arguments presented by the assessee.Issue 3 - Appeal Against CIT(A) Order:Both the assessee and the Department appealed against the CIT(A) order. The Department challenged the deletion of the Rs. 15 lakhs addition, emphasizing the confession made during the survey. The Tribunal, considering legal precedents and lack of supporting evidence, upheld the deletion. The assessee appealed regarding disallowances under sections 40A(3) and 40(a)(ia), presenting legal judgments supporting their position. The Tribunal remitted the disallowances back to the AO for a fresh assessment, emphasizing the need for a fair consideration of the evidence provided.In conclusion, the Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal and allowed the assessee's appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of evidence and legal compliance in tax assessments.
TaxTMI 