Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a return voluntarily filed under section 22(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 ceases to be a valid return because it discloses income below the taxable limit, and whether assessment could validly proceed on such a return without recourse to section 34.
Analysis: A return filed in response to the public notice under section 22(1) is still a return within the meaning of the Act, even if the income disclosed is below the taxable minimum. The meaning of the word "return" cannot vary between the sub-sections of section 22 so as to treat a voluntarily filed return as no return at all merely because the assessee stated income below the assessable limit. Such a construction would produce anomalous consequences, including the possible application of penalty provisions and the defeat of the statutory scheme. A voluntary return submitted without any prior notice under section 22(2) therefore validly sets assessment proceedings in motion, and section 34 is not attracted on that ground.
Conclusion: The return was a valid return under section 22(1), and the assessment was valid.
Ratio Decidendi: A voluntary return filed under section 22(1) remains a legally effective return notwithstanding that it discloses income below the taxable limit, and assessment may proceed on that basis without invoking section 34 merely for want of a notice under section 22(2).