Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income arising from the admission of minor children to the benefits of partnership in a firm in which the mother is a partner could be included in the mother's assessable income under Section 16(3)(a)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The provision used the word "individual" as the unit of taxation and was not confined to a male assessee. The language of Section 16(3)(a)(ii) was clear and did not warrant reading in a restriction that the relevant individual must be the father. The corresponding language in sub-clause (i) showed that where the legislature intended a gender-specific reference, it said so expressly. The Court declined to rely on the Enquiry Report because the statutory wording itself created no real ambiguity.
Conclusion: The question was answered in the affirmative. The minors' shares of profits from the firm were includible in the mother's assessable income.
Final Conclusion: A mother, being an "individual" within the meaning of the provision, could be assessed on the minors' partnership income arising from admission to the benefits of the firm in which she was a partner.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory language is clear, Section 16(3)(a)(ii) applies to any individual, including a mother, and the income of minors admitted to the benefits of partnership in a firm in which she is a partner is includible in her assessment.