Temple endowment under public worship test: consecration rites were not essential, and the scheme power was upheld.

A dedication under a settlement deed can create a religious endowment connected with a temple where the property is intended for and used as public religious worship. Under the Act, the decisive test is actual dedication and user for worship, not conformity with Agama Sastras or the performance of prana pratishta or kumbhabhisheka. The deed and evidence showed a clear dedication for worship of the nalvar idols, with daily pooja, neivedyam, shodasa upacharams and guru pooja, and the idols were installed and worshipped by the public in the temple premises. On that basis, the endowment fell within the statutory definition and the scheme-making power under Section 64 was attracted; the challenge to the scheme failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the dedication under the settlement deed created a religious endowment connected with a temple so as to attract the scheme-making power under Section 64; whether installation and consecration ceremonies such as prana pratishta and kumbhabhisheka were essential to constitute the idols' place as a temple within the Act.

Analysis: The statutory definition of "religious endowment" includes property endowed for a temple or for religious charity connected therewith, and "temple" means a place used as a place of public religious worship by the Hindu community or any section thereof. On that definition, the decisive test is not conformity with Agama Sastras or the performance of any particular consecratory rites, but whether the place is in fact dedicated to and used for public religious worship. The evidence and the deed showed a pure and simple dedication for worship of the nalvar idols, with provision for daily pooja, neivedyam, shodasa upacharams and guru pooja. The absence of prana pratishta or kumbhabhisheka was not fatal, because such ceremonies are not a legal requisite under the Act for images of saints, and public user as of right is cogent evidence of a temple and endowment. The materials also showed that the idols were installed and worshipped in the temple premises by the public.

Conclusion: The dedication constituted a valid religious endowment connected with a temple, and the Deputy Commissioner had power to frame the scheme under Section 64.

Final Conclusion: The appellant's challenge to the scheme failed, and the scheme was upheld.

Ratio Decidendi: For the purposes of the Act, a temple is constituted by a place used for public religious worship, and a valid religious endowment may be created without performance of any particular consecratory ceremonies if the intention to dedicate for worship is clearly expressed and the property is in fact used as such.

---