Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sum of Rs. 79,532 could validly be assessed under section 34 of the Indian Income-tax Act for the assessment year 1939-40, when the receipts said to constitute that amount had in fact been received as interest more than eight years before the reassessment proceedings.
Analysis: The receipts forming the disputed amount were shown to have been actually received as interest in the years 1922, 1928, 1929 and 1930. The fact that the assessee treated them as lying in suspense, or believed that they were not yet taxable because litigation was pending, did not alter their character as receipts already received. Section 34 permitted reassessment only within the prescribed period counted from the relevant year of receipt. The decision relied on by the revenue concerning appropriation of open payments had no application, because these sums were not mere unappropriated payments on account but were treated and received as interest. Once the earlier interest receipts were excluded from the 1939-40 reassessment, the balance of Rs. 79,532 could not be brought to tax under section 34.
Conclusion: The reassessment of Rs. 79,532 under section 34 was invalid and the answer to the question was in the negative, in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Amounts actually received as income in earlier years cannot be reassessed under section 34 after the statutory period has expired merely because the assessee did not disclose them or treated them as not yet taxable.