TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court Invalidates Circulars Extending Tax Scope; Clarifies Professional Services Exemption</h1> <h3>All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants And Others Versus Central Board Of Direct Taxes And Others</h3> All Gujarat Federation Of Tax Consultants And Others Versus Central Board Of Direct Taxes And Others - [1995] 214 ITR 276, 126 CTR 288, 80 TAXMANN 460 Issues Involved:1. Validity of Circular No. 666 dated October 8, 1993, and Circular No. 681 dated March 8, 1994.2. Applicability of section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to various professional and service contracts.Summary:Issue 1: Validity of Circular No. 666 and Circular No. 681The petitions challenged the validity of Circular No. 666 dated October 8, 1993, and Circular No. 681 dated March 8, 1994, issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT). The circulars expanded the scope of section 194C of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to include service contracts and transport contracts. The court noted that these circulars were issued following the Supreme Court judgment in Associated Cement Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1993] 201 ITR 435, which interpreted the term 'any work' in section 194C broadly. However, the court found that the circulars misinterpreted the Supreme Court's judgment and extended the scope of section 194C beyond its intended limits. Consequently, the court quashed Circular No. 666 and Circular No. 681.Issue 2: Applicability of Section 194C to Professional and Service ContractsThe primary contention was whether section 194C, which mandates tax deduction at source (TDS) for payments to contractors, applies to payments made to professionals such as advocates, chartered accountants, and other service providers. The court examined the language of section 194C and the historical context, including earlier circulars (Circular No. 86 dated May 29, 1972, and Circular No. 93 dated September 26, 1972) which clarified that professional services do not fall under 'contracts for carrying out any work.' The court concluded that section 194C does not apply to professional services or service contracts that do not involve carrying out any work. The court emphasized that professionals like lawyers, doctors, and architects are engaged for their expertise and not for carrying out work as contractors. The court also noted that the proposed amendments in the Finance Bill, 1995, to include professional services under section 194C indicated that such services were not originally intended to be covered by this section.Conclusion:The court held that professional services and service contracts that do not involve carrying out any work are not covered by section 194C. Accordingly, Circular No. 666 dated October 8, 1993, and Circular No. 681 dated March 8, 1994, were quashed. The court ruled that there was no justification for altering the interpretation of section 194C based on the decision in Associated Cement Co. Ltd. [1993] 201 ITR 435 (SC). The rule was made absolute in each petition, with no order as to costs.
TaxTMI 