Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether income derived by a co-operative society from letting out surplus space in its building is an activity covered by section 80P(2)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether any referable question of law arose for the Tribunal to state a case under section 256(2).
Analysis: Section 80P grants deduction to co-operative societies according to the nature of the activities carried on. The provision in clause (c) applies only to activities of the society other than those specified in clauses (a) and (b), and the deduction is confined to profits and gains attributable to such activities. Income from letting out surplus building space is not part of the society's corporate activity or the combination of operations undertaken by it. On that footing, the statutory language was treated as clear, leaving no room for debate on the suggested question.
Conclusion: The income from letting out surplus space did not qualify for deduction under section 80P(2)(c), and no question of law arose for reference. The petition was dismissed.