Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad allows assessee's appeal in Appeal No. 11/2013</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Hyderabad set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee in Appeal No. 11/2013 dated 28-11-2014. ... Infructuous appeal - effect of prior identical disposal - setting aside impugned order and allowing appealInfructuous appeal - effect of prior identical disposal - The departmental appeal is infructuous and liable to be dismissed because the same impugned order has already been set aside in a prior, identical appeal in favour of the assessee. - HELD THAT: - The Tribunal recorded that Appeal No.20412/2015, filed against the same order-in-appeal, was earlier disposed of by this Tribunal by Final Order No.31040/2016 dated 14-10-2016, which set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. In view of that prior disposal and the fact that the impugned order has been set aside, the departmental appeal before this Bench is rendered infructuous. No further adjudication on the merits was necessary.Departmental appeal dismissed as infructuous.Final Conclusion: The appeal filed by the department is dismissed as infructuous in view of the earlier Tribunal order setting aside the impugned order and allowing the assessee's appeal. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Hyderabad in the case of Appeal No.11/2013 dated 28-11-2014, set aside the impugned order and allowed the appeal filed by the assessee. The appeal filed by the department was dismissed as infructuous.