Transfer pricing for management support services turns on proof of rendition and close linkage for TNMM aggregation.

Transfer pricing analysis confirms that arm's length price for management support services cannot be set at nil merely by doubting commercial expediency; the taxpayer must still demonstrate that the associated enterprise actually rendered the services. Where the evidence does not substantiate rendition, a nil ALP determination is sustained. The note also states that management support fees may be aggregated with other international transactions only when they are closely linked and part of a composite arrangement. In the absence of such linkage, benchmarking the bundled transaction under TNMM is not accepted, and the transfer pricing adjustment is maintained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the arm's length price of management support services fee paid to the associated enterprise could be determined at nil. (ii) Whether the management support fee transaction could be bundled with other transactions and benchmarked under the Transactional Net Margin Method.

Issue (i): Whether the arm's length price of management support services fee paid to the associated enterprise could be determined at nil.

Analysis: The principle that the tax authority cannot question the commercial necessity of incurring expenditure was applied, and it was accepted that ALP cannot be fixed at nil merely on that basis. However, the assessee still had to prove actual rendition of services by the associated enterprise. On the record, the assessee failed to produce convincing evidence to establish that the claimed management support services were in fact rendered. The material produced did not discharge that burden, and the finding that services were not proved remained unrebutted.

Conclusion: The determination of ALP at nil was upheld and the issue was decided against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the management support fee transaction could be bundled with other transactions and benchmarked under the Transactional Net Margin Method.

Analysis: Aggregation of transactions is permissible only where the transactions are closely linked and form part of a composite arrangement. The assessee did not establish that the management support fee was so closely connected with the other international transactions as to justify clubbing them for benchmarking purposes. In the absence of such linkage, the plea for applying TNMM to the bundled transaction was not accepted.

Conclusion: The request to bundle the transaction and benchmark it under TNMM was rejected and the issue was decided against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The transfer pricing adjustment relating to management support services was sustained, and the assessee's appeal failed in full.

Ratio Decidendi: ALP cannot be reduced to nil by questioning business expediency, but the assessee must still prove actual rendition of services, and aggregation is permissible only for closely linked transactions.

---