Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (9) TMI 1108 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Grants Stay, Deems AO's Actions Unlawful The Tribunal granted a stay in favor of the assessee, finding a prima facie good case on merits. It deemed the AO's attachment of bank accounts and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Grants Stay, Deems AO's Actions Unlawful

                          The Tribunal granted a stay in favor of the assessee, finding a prima facie good case on merits. It deemed the AO's attachment of bank accounts and recovery unsustainable, directing an immediate refund. The Tribunal allowed the stay applications, with main appeals scheduled for a hearing on merit.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Recording of satisfaction
                          2. Treatment of interest income on deposits made during the construction period
                          3. Taxability of interest income accrued on deposits made with the District Court, Bathinda under the direction of the Supreme Court
                          4. Claim of carry forward of business loss
                          5. Bona fide/Inadvertent mistake

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Recording of Satisfaction:
                          The assessee argued that the Assessing Officer (AO) did not properly record satisfaction regarding the filing of inaccurate particulars of income in the assessment order. The AO initiated penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for alleged concealment of particulars of income but levied the penalty for alleged "concealment/furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income." This discrepancy was highlighted, arguing that the penalty cannot be levied for alleged filing of inaccurate particulars of income without specific findings.

                          2. Treatment of Interest Income on Deposits Made During the Construction Period:
                          The assessee earned interest income from funds temporarily deposited in fixed deposits during the construction period. Initially, this interest was treated as income chargeable under the head 'Income from other sources'. However, relying on the decision in "Indian Oil Panipat Power Consortium Limited vs. ITO," the assessee revised its return, claiming that the interest income should reduce the project cost as it was inextricably linked to the setting up of the plant. The AO, however, taxed the interest income as "income from other sources," a decision upheld by the CIT(A) and ITAT. The appeal against this decision is pending before the High Court.

                          3. Taxability of Interest Income Accrued on Deposits with the District Court, Bathinda:
                          Interest accrued on deposits made with the District Court, Bathinda, under the direction of the Supreme Court was argued to be set off against the cost of the refinery project. The AO and the Tribunal held that the interest income should be taxed as "income from other sources." However, the assessee contended that since the deposit was made under the Supreme Court's direction, the interest should not be taxable as the right over the income was inchoate. The assessee cited several case laws to support the argument that income would not accrue until the dispute is settled.

                          4. Claim of Carry Forward of Business Loss:
                          The assessee incurred revenue expenditure during the year but, due to an inadvertent mistake, showed project-related expenditure as business loss. This expenditure was not claimed as set off against income from other sources but was carried forward as business loss. The AO accepted the mistake during assessment, but a penalty was levied for alleged concealment of particulars of income. The assessee argued that no penalty is leviable for such inadvertent mistakes, citing several case laws to support this position.

                          5. Bona fide/Inadvertent Mistake:
                          The assessee argued that the claims made were bona fide and based on legal interpretations where two views were possible. The AO failed to specify the particulars of income alleged to have been concealed. The assessee cited various case laws to argue that concealment penalties are not leviable in cases of bona fide legal claims and inadvertent mistakes.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal found that the assessee had a prima facie good case on merits. The balance of convenience was in favor of the assessee, and irreparable loss would occur if the stay was not granted. The AO's attachment of the bank accounts and recovery was deemed unsustainable, and the AO was directed to refund the amount immediately. The stay applications were allowed, and the main appeals were scheduled for hearing on merit.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found