Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a water storage tank used in the assessee's water-supply business qualified as "plant" for depreciation under section 10(2)(vi) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 read with rule 8 and the schedule thereto.
Analysis: The term "plant" was not exhaustively defined in the Act, so its ordinary and extended meanings were relevant. Even so, the word was held to connote apparatus or instruments employed in carrying on a business, especially in a manufacturing or industrial context. A water storage tank used merely as a container for the assessee's stock-in-trade did not fall within that concept. The reference to reservoirs in the salt-works entries in the schedule to rule 8 did not justify extending the term to every water reservoir used in any business, because those reservoirs formed part of industrial manufacturing apparatus. The authorities cited on the broader meaning of "plant" did not support treating the storage place of stock-in-trade as plant.
Conclusion: The water storage tank was not "plant" within section 10(2)(vi), and depreciation was not allowable.