Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income of the assessee, carrying on auctioneers' work as a profession, depended wholly or mainly on the personal qualifications of the partners within the meaning of section 2(5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act.
Analysis: The exclusion from excess profits tax applies where the profits of a profession depend wholly or mainly on the personal qualifications of the persons carrying it on. The Tribunal had rejected the claim on a general view that auctioneering in India required no special qualification, rather than on the facts of the particular case. On the material found, the firm's long experience, the partners' qualifications and efficiency, the attraction of substantial government work, and the comparative success of the firm were relevant circumstances bearing on whether the profits were mainly attributable to personal qualifications. The nature of auctioneering itself also involved skill, experience, and judgment in securing business and obtaining sales.
Conclusion: The income of the assessee depended mainly on the personal qualifications of the partners, and the question was answered in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the profits of a profession are substantially attributable to the personal skill, experience, and qualifications of the persons carrying it on, the exclusion under section 2(5) of the Excess Profits Tax Act applies, and the matter cannot be decided on a mere generalisation divorced from the facts of the particular case.