Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proceeds of collections made for a professional cricketer at matches were taxable as profits arising from his employment under Schedule E.
Analysis: The collections were made pursuant to the player's contract of service and the incorporated league rules, which gave him an enforceable right to have collections made when specified performances were achieved. The relevant test was whether, from the recipient's standpoint, the sums accrued to him by virtue of his employment and by way of remuneration for services, even though the payments were voluntarily made by spectators and were described by them as gifts, tributes, or testimonials. The Court distinguished cases where payments were personal testimonials or retirement benefits, noting that here the collections were recurrent, connected with the professional engagement, and formed part of what the player was entitled to receive under the contract.
Conclusion: The collections were taxable profits arising from the employment and not mere personal gifts; the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: A voluntary payment is taxable as employment income if, viewed from the recipient's standpoint, it accrues to him by virtue of his employment and is contractually connected with the services rendered, even though it is made by third parties without legal obligation.