Product classification clarification must be decided before assessment continues to prevent prejudice to the assessee

A clarification application on product classification was made under the statutory determination mechanism, while assessment notices proposed to proceed on the footing that the product was a branded aerated soft drink. The court held that the clarification request should be considered promptly after hearing the assessee, and directed that the assessment proceedings arising from the notices remain in abeyance until the clarification order is passed and communicated. This prevents prejudice to the assessee by ensuring that the classification issue is decided before the assessment process continues.

---

---

Issues: Whether the authority should be directed to decide the assessee's clarification application on the classification of the product before continuing with the assessment proceedings initiated by the notices.

Analysis: The request for clarification was made under the statutory mechanism for seeking determination of classification, and the pending notices proposed assessment on the footing that the product was a branded aerated soft drink. The Court found that, in the interests of justice, the clarification application required prompt consideration after hearing the assessee. To avoid prejudice from continuation of the assessment process before the classification question was decided, the proceedings pursuant to the notices were directed to remain in abeyance until the clarification order was passed and communicated.

Conclusion: The assessee succeeded to the extent of securing a direction for early disposal of the clarification application and suspension of further assessment proceedings until that decision.

---