Cash deposit additions require proof of third-party nexus and transaction-by-transaction explanation before tax treatment can be sustained.

Cash deposits found in the assessee's bank accounts were disputed as third-party marble trading receipts handled for commission, but the record did not adequately verify the party-wise deposits, the identity of the beneficiaries, or the nexus between deposits and withdrawals. Because the appellate material had not been properly reconciled or confronted, the addition could not be finally sustained on the existing record and the matter was remitted for fresh examination. The governing principle stated that, where cash deposits are claimed to belong to third parties, the assessee must explain each transaction and establish the linkage between deposits and withdrawals before any conclusive tax treatment is made.

---

---

Issues: Whether the addition made on the basis of cash deposits in the assessee's bank accounts could be sustained as business receipts from marble trading, or whether the matter required fresh examination with verification of the nature of deposits, withdrawals, and linkage with the alleged beneficiaries.

Analysis: The cash deposits were found in bank accounts maintained and operated by the assessee, and the assessee claimed that they belonged to marble traders and represented facilitated transactions for commission. The appellate record showed that the assessment had shifted from taxing commission income to treating the deposits as turnover from marble trading, but the material necessary to verify the assessee's explanation had not been properly reconciled or confronted. The determining factors were the party-wise details of deposits, the identity of the beneficiaries, and the nexus between deposits and subsequent withdrawals. Since those details were not adequately examined at the appellate stage, the matter required a deeper and coordinated verification before a conclusive finding could be reached.

Conclusion: The existing addition could not be finally upheld on the material then on record, and the dispute was remitted for fresh examination.

Ratio Decidendi: When cash deposits in bank accounts are disputed as belonging to third parties, the assessee must explain each transaction and establish the nexus between deposits and withdrawals; if the record is insufficient for a conclusive finding, the matter may be set aside for fresh adjudication.

---