Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the occupation of a portion of business premises by a partner for his personal residence constituted a benefit or perquisite taxable under section 28(iv) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The question was answered by applying the earlier binding view that a benefit or perquisite arising from occupation of premises by a partner or director is includible in income under section 28(iv). The assessee's personal use of part of the flat, though the premises were also used partly for the firm's business, was treated as giving rise to a taxable perquisite.
Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The assessee was rightly assessed to tax on the value of the benefit or perquisite arising from occupation of the portion of the premises.