Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether notices issued under section 22(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1922, after the amendment made by the Amending Act of 1953 were valid in relation to an assessment year prior to the amendment, and whether retrospective application of the amended provision offended article 14 of the Constitution of India.
Analysis: Section 22(4) was treated as part of the machinery for assessment and not as a provision affecting the substantive liability to tax. The amendment enlarging the Income-tax Officer's power to call for particulars and information was held to be procedural in character, and procedural provisions ordinarily apply to pending proceedings from the date they become operative. The reference in the amending Act to operation from 1 April 1952 was construed as validating notices issued after that date under the amended form of section 22(4), even where the assessment year related to an earlier period. The plea under article 14 failed because there is no vested right in procedure and no discrimination arises when the same procedural rule applies equally to all assessments pending when the amendment came into force.
Conclusion: The notices under section 22(4) were valid, the amended provision applied to the pending assessment, and the challenge based on article 14 was rejected.