Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the ex parte assessment orders passed under the entry tax law were liable to be quashed for want of proper notice and opportunity of hearing, and whether the matters required fresh assessment after granting such opportunity.
Analysis: The writ petitioner challenged the assessment orders on the ground that they had been passed without adequate notice or sufficient time to place its case. The respondents accepted that the assessments should be redone after affording proper opportunity. The Court found that the orders had been made in undue haste without granting a proper hearing, and that the petitioner should be given an effective chance to produce its records and make submissions before the authority.
Conclusion: The assessment orders were quashed and set aside, and the matters were directed to be assessed afresh after giving the petitioner an opportunity to present its case.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order passed without affording a proper opportunity of hearing violates the principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained.