Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a disabled employee can be denied promotion merely on the ground of disability under Section 47 of the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, and whether the proviso to sub-section (2) permits denial of that protection in the absence of a notification exempting the establishment.
Analysis: Section 47(2) expressly prohibits denial of promotion merely on the ground of disability. The proviso does not create a general power to exclude establishments at will; it operates only when the appropriate Government issues a notification, having regard to the type of work carried on in the establishment, and specifies the conditions of exemption. A proviso cannot be used to expand the main enactment or to import an implied exclusion where no notification exists. On the facts, no valid notification exempting the establishment was shown, and the employee was denied consideration only because he was regarded as visually handicapped.
Conclusion: The denial of promotion was not justified, and the challenge to the Tribunal's order failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 47(2) confers a substantive protection against denial of promotion on the ground of disability, and the proviso can operate only through a specific governmental notification exempting an establishment from that statutory mandate.