Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the FIR and all subsequent proceedings under the Indian Penal Code were liable to be quashed on the ground that the alleged offence, if any, fell within Chapter X of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005.
Analysis: The petition invoked the inherent jurisdiction of the High Court for quashing of the FIR and consequential proceedings. The only substantive basis pressed was that the alleged act, assuming it constituted an offence, was covered by the special fiscal statute and not by the general penal provisions invoked in the FIR. The State accepted this position.
Conclusion: The FIR and all subsequent proceedings were quashed. The petition was allowed, leaving the authorities free to proceed, if warranted, under the relevant provisions of the Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005.